Silent rooftop wind turbines could generate half of a household’s energy needs

Silent-rooftop-wind-turbines

The use of wind turbines in households is becoming more and more popular. Wind power like other natural power sources can be quite volatile, but it’s still a highly sustainable power source for those who want to live an off-the-grid lifestyle. A Dutch renewable energy start-up called The Archimedes, developed this product named Liam F1 turbine which is a small and silent wind turbine that will change the way we view wind power. Their product will be able to generate 1,500 kWh of energy per year and can be installed on the rooftop of a house. The best part is, that when the Liam F1 is matched with solar panels, it can generate enough power for an entire household. This way you can alternate between the use of solar power and wind power, having a backup in case the weather conditions are not suitable for you.

Silent-rooftop-wind-turbines-1

Silent-rooftop-wind-turbines-2


Social

63 Responses to “Silent rooftop wind turbines could generate half of a household’s energy needs”

  1. David McCarthy says:

    Err… Is the article about a wind turbine or solar power – seems to be some confusion!

  2. Zeo says:

    Nice design, kinda artistic, but practical. So, how much and what are the specs?

  3. Vijay Jolly says:

    Please provide some technical details regarding the Roof Top Wind Turbine

    • Andy says:

      Watching the video there is some data there; the 750mm diameter version is rated at 200W and the 1.5m diameter unit at 1kW.

      • Robert Lehmert says:

        My rooftop PV system nominally generates 5.76 kW and cost $24,000 delivered and installed in Vermont, before any incentives. It is sufficient to completely displace an electric bill of about $115 a month.

        • Star says:

          That’s about 17 years to pay off the cost of the system before you actually benefit from being self sufficient? How long is the warranty for this system? Totally serious, I would love to have solar or wind power, but not sure if it’s cost effective, especially if the system needs replacement, repair, or breaks before I could benefit after paying it off.

        • Paul says:

          So about a 17 year payback not including interest….so maybe more like 20 year.

          • kejji says:

            Just for your information, 115$ because the price of 1Kwh is actualy low
            Suppose that after 5 years the price is double, what will happen?

  4. Ella Dikeman says:

    your generator looks promising, how much would it cost a homeowner to buy one and get it in working order,?

  5. Werner says:

    How can we find out price of turbine if interested? We are in Northern WI, USA

  6. Nick says:

    Hi. I’m interested to find out more about the roof wind turbine. Also would like too know if it can be installed in Malta & how much it would cost. thanks

  7. weseld1 says:

    “Their product will be able to generate 1,500 kWh of energy per year” 1 year = 8766 hours, so this turbine will generate 1500 kWh / 8766 hr = 171 watts. Almost enough to light three 60w light bulbs. It will “could generate half of a household’s energy needs” IF the household wanted to live up to the lighting standards of, say, 1900. Never mind providing any power for heating, cooking, or washing which are a lot more than 171 watts. It is a nice little wind turbine and I would want one on my cabin roof for emergency power to my radio, but it is a long way from meeting half the needs of a household.

    • Michael Hartley says:

      Guess you haven’t yet switched to LED’s!

    • Opie says:

      I have to ask who is this day age uses conventional light bulbs? If your house is loaded with 60w light bulbs than maybe alternative energy is not for you.

    • Mark says:

      From the website “Considering the electricity use of an average Dutch household lies around 3300 kwh (kilowatt hours) a year, it is possible to generate half of your used electricity by installing the Archimedes on your roof. “

    • Stephen Heatley says:

      Your maths are wrong…..kwh are the number of watts per hour, ie, in this case 1500 watts per hour, and, with the right wind speed. If the output was 1500 watts per hour over a year then the total output would be 8766 hours times 1,500, ie, 4383watts plus 8766 watts. However wind speeds vary from strong to nill, so output might only be 2 hours per day maximum, which would still give 3 kwhs of power, enough for most to live on.

      • shots says:

        sorry but you are reading this wrong it says and I quote ” Their product will be able to generate 1,500 kWh of energy per year.” That is per year.. I use between 22 and 35 kilowatts per day depending on the time of the year.. more in the summer for the pool and AC… so the total per year at an average of 25 kilowatts per day is only good for 60 days.. sorry they go to make it better then that for me .. and I have no incandescent bulbs in my house

    • Mary says:

      Thank you for making this point. We use about 2200 kWh per MONTH. It would take 9 of these to provide half our needs.

      Still, I am glad to see the technology. Someday, I hope it is feasible. If I had the money, I would seriously be looking into this kind of thing just to take pressure off oil.

  8. Kurt says:

    Please send details costs etc
    To South Africa. Port Elizabeth. Actually Jeffreys Bay
    Thank you

  9. alice h says:

    I always wonder why people don’t understand that a posting about an item is not necessarily from the originator and thus will not supply further information. Bestir yourselves and do some research people! If you enter the name of the thing you’re curious about into a search engine you too could find information like this dearchimedes.com/sales/.

  10. Denise says:

    Interested, need more information please

  11. Kootzie says:

    The claim that this windmill could meet half of a household’s energy needs is massively overstated and is only true for a superinsulated passive solar off-grid house with an efficient energy storage system in an area with high average/sustained windspeed

  12. Pascal says:

    You relate to the smaller model right? The 1.5m model would do better no? A small battery bank might allow lighting, tv, fridge (ours uses 38watts an hour) and other small things to run on it I assume

  13. Manjunath LM says:

    I am interested to procure, trade and install. Kindly send me the detail specification and price
    Regards

  14. ianthomas62@hotmail.com says:

    please send info and prices. Thank you
    Ian Thomas

  15. Karen Lundgren says:

    Please read to the bottom of the page…..

    Goodshomedesign is an online home design magazine but do not sell the products reviewed or showcased on this site. We try to show you what is new and beautiful in this area, arranged in several categories (apartments, ideas, interior design, home decor, home design, kitchen, bedroom, bathroom, furniture, hotels & resorts, architecture) related to the area and style.

    See more at: http://www.goodshomedesign.com/silent-rooftop-wind-turbines-could-generate-half-of-a-households-energy-needs/

  16. Mm says:

    A typical house in California only needs about 10k kwH.
    Two of these, and 10 solar PV and a couple of power walls from Tesla could make you grid free.

  17. Tyson says:

    Nope. Just nope. kW is the instantaneous power output. kWh is a measure of energy and is kW x hours.

  18. Joanne says:

    I want a wind turbine where do I order

  19. Seawind says:

    Thanks for clearing how much they use to make an estimate of how much it produces. Unfortunately, this summer, we used about 3000 in our RV each month. Not a good option for South Texas summers.

  20. Theresa says:

    You took my thoughts. Lol. Thanks.

  21. Russell Barndt says:

    Every Rush Limbaugh fan still use 60watt loght bulbs but many Rushsees will actually throw CFC light bulbs away ,some will also throw LED away

  22. Gary Mathis says:

    LOL. 1.5 KWh per year? The grid will provide the average house with 420 MWh per year. This is 3d world starvation energy.

  23. Don says:

    This seems to be the manufacturer’s website. I’m waiting on a response from the US reseller.

    dearchimedes.com/

    -Don-

  24. michelle says:

    does it need water to convert energy?

  25. Azmi says:

    Have this unit being sold world wide…?

  26. Bhushan Nirgude says:

    what is its cost variant wise and maintenance ?

  27. Jon says:

    These specific wind turbines have been kicking about for years and years. Why no working prototype after all these years? Because they are a scam, they cannot work, they won’t work, ask any engineer and they will tell you that they are just plane stupid. They claim to generate 1500kWh per year – I have two responses to that… They won’t generate anything like that, in fact they probably won’t generate anything at all… And even if they did then that is 4kWh a day which is a tiny fraction of what a house uses. If you want t a wind turbine then buy a windy property out of town with access to the top of a windy hill and buy a normal machine from a reputable company.

  28. Scott says:

    Does anyone remember when the internet first started, how I believe its purpose was for information to be shared for people to get instruction on how to build things, and the planes were shared for free. Then greed took over as it always does and everything is for sale. Sad world we now live in today.

  29. Bryan says:

    If the average US household power need is just over 10,000 kWh, how can 1.5 kWh be half of annual power need? Granted, this all depends on where you live, but the boasting has got to stop and manufacturers need to start developing products that can meet such expectations. We want wind and solar, but we need reasonably affordable and effective products to take advantage of these resources.

  30. Caspar says:

    What the manufacturers of these small windmills generally don’t mention is the poor efficiency. While the turbine will start turning at low wind speeds, it won’t actually generate meaningful energy below 5,5m/s.

  31. Timmy says:

    Gary I think you have zeros in all the wrong places. They said 1500 kWh not 1.5. Also the average home does not use 420 MWh a year. It is more like 4.2 MWh a year or 4200 kWh. So just shy of a third of the ‘average’ home’s energy consumption. If the average home used 420 MWh, electricity bills would be like ten grand a month.

  32. David says:

    Wind is the result of the heating of air by the sun. The heated air rises causing cooler air to move in to fill the lower pressure area. Think convection currents. Amazingly there are a lot of things happening which are really solar by products.

  33. Steve says:

    This is still in the design and testing phase. They started testing a larger one that will only be rated at about 500watts. It might supply half a homes needs if you are very conservative and live in a windy area.

  34. Robert R says:

    $24,000? Grossly overpriced. Might be $500 cost to build. Ridiculous

  35. Northwind Homestead says:

    In a way the statement is correct. The sun causes the pressure variations that crrate wind.
    So yes, wind is solar energy.

  36. Rob Talmadge says:

    price is not listed on their web site. how much?

  37. AAron says:

    SO, I did not read the article, only the comments.
    My conclusion from the comments is this.
    Buy more solar panels because wind is solar power.

    All a by-product of solar energy: Earth, Air, Fire, Water
    Everything that exists is created by the sun.

    It’s a wind turbine, not a solar panel.

  38. Guy says:

    Not artistic, natural and geometric. Its a mathematically sound shape.

  39. Jon Green says:

    the average american household uses 10,8 kwh of electricity per year so you’d need 8 of the larger units. You know where these things would go well? Put them on top of street light poles. Even thousands of the smaller units per city would have a big effect.

Leave a Reply

© 2018 Home Design, Garden & Architecture Blog Magazine. All rights reserved.